[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <537514D3.4060308@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 00:56:11 +0530
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC: peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...nel.org,
rusty@...tcorp.com.au, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
fweisbec@...il.com, hch@...radead.org, mgorman@...e.de,
riel@...hat.com, bp@...e.de, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mgalbraith@...e.de, ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, oleg@...hat.com, rjw@...ysocki.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] CPU hotplug, smp: Flush any pending IPI callbacks
before CPU offline
On 05/16/2014 12:49 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 12:44:13AM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>> /*
>> + * flush_smp_call_function_queue - Flush any pending smp-call-function
>
> Don't we need a blank line here?
>
Hmm? That sentence continues on the next line, hence I didn't add any blank
line there.
>> + * callbacks queued on this CPU (including those for which the source CPU's
>> + * IPIs might not have been received on this CPU yet). This is invoked by a
>> + * CPU about to go offline, to ensure that all pending IPI functions are run
>> + * before it goes completely offline.
>> + *
>> + * Loop through the call_single_queue and run all the queued functions.
>> + * Must be called with interrupts disabled.
>> + */
>
> Other than that, looks good to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
>
Thank you!
Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists