| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <537518D6.6030006@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 01:13:18 +0530
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
CC: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, peterz@...radead.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...nel.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, fweisbec@...il.com, hch@...radead.org,
mgorman@...e.de, riel@...hat.com, bp@...e.de, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mgalbraith@...e.de, ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, oleg@...hat.com,
rjw@...ysocki.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 UPDATED 3/3] CPU hotplug, smp: Flush any pending IPI callbacks
before CPU offline
On 05/16/2014 01:06 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 12:56:11AM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>> On 05/16/2014 12:49 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 12:44:13AM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>>>> /*
>>>> + * flush_smp_call_function_queue - Flush any pending smp-call-function
>>>
>>> Don't we need a blank line here?
>>
>> Hmm? That sentence continues on the next line, hence I didn't add any blank
>> line there.
>
> Tejun might be wanting this to be a docbook comment, in which case
> it also needs "/**" at the beginning of the comment.
>
Oh, I see. Like this?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
[PATCH v5 UPDATED 3/3] CPU hotplug, smp: Flush any pending IPI callbacks before CPU offline
During CPU offline, in the stop-machine loop, we use 2 separate stages to
disable interrupts, to ensure that the CPU going offline doesn't get any new
IPIs from the other CPUs after it has gone offline.
However, an IPI sent much earlier might arrive late on the target CPU
(possibly _after_ the CPU has gone offline) due to hardware latencies,
and due to this, the smp-call-function callbacks queued on the outgoing
CPU might not get noticed (and hence not executed) at all.
This is somewhat theoretical, but in any case, it makes sense to explicitly
loop through the call_single_queue and flush any pending callbacks before the
CPU goes completely offline. So, flush the queued smp-call-function callbacks
in the MULTI_STOP_DISABLE_IRQ_ACTIVE stage, after disabling interrupts on the
active CPU. That way, we would have handled all the queued callbacks before
going offline, and also, no new IPIs can be sent by the other CPUs to the
outgoing CPU at that point, because they will all be executing the stop-machine
code with interrupts disabled.
Suggested-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
include/linux/smp.h | 2 ++
kernel/smp.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/stop_machine.c | 11 +++++++++++
3 files changed, 46 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/smp.h b/include/linux/smp.h
index 633f5ed..7924191 100644
--- a/include/linux/smp.h
+++ b/include/linux/smp.h
@@ -52,6 +52,8 @@ void on_each_cpu_cond(bool (*cond_func)(int cpu, void *info),
int smp_call_function_single_async(int cpu, struct call_single_data *csd);
+void flush_smp_call_function_queue(void);
+
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
#include <linux/preempt.h>
diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
index ae45446..a152152 100644
--- a/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/kernel/smp.c
@@ -212,6 +212,39 @@ void generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt(void)
}
}
+/**
+ * flush_smp_call_function_queue - Flush pending smp-call-function callbacks
+ *
+ * Flush any pending smp-call-function callbacks queued on this CPU (including
+ * those for which the source CPU's IPIs might not have been received on this
+ * CPU yet). This is invoked by a CPU about to go offline, to ensure that all
+ * pending IPI functions are run before it goes completely offline.
+ *
+ * Loop through the call_single_queue and run all the queued functions.
+ * Must be called with interrupts disabled.
+ */
+void flush_smp_call_function_queue(void)
+{
+ struct llist_head *head;
+ struct llist_node *entry;
+ struct call_single_data *csd, *csd_next;
+
+ WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled());
+
+ head = &__get_cpu_var(call_single_queue);
+
+ if (likely(llist_empty(head)))
+ return;
+
+ entry = llist_del_all(head);
+ entry = llist_reverse_order(entry);
+
+ llist_for_each_entry_safe(csd, csd_next, entry, llist) {
+ csd->func(csd->info);
+ csd_unlock(csd);
+ }
+}
+
/*
* smp_call_function_single - Run a function on a specific CPU
* @func: The function to run. This must be fast and non-blocking.
diff --git a/kernel/stop_machine.c b/kernel/stop_machine.c
index 288f7fe..6b3a2f3 100644
--- a/kernel/stop_machine.c
+++ b/kernel/stop_machine.c
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
#include <linux/smpboot.h>
#include <linux/atomic.h>
#include <linux/lglock.h>
+#include <linux/smp.h>
/*
* Structure to determine completion condition and record errors. May
@@ -224,6 +225,16 @@ static int multi_cpu_stop(void *data)
local_irq_disable();
hard_irq_disable();
}
+
+ /*
+ * IPIs (from the inactive CPUs) might arrive
+ * late due to hardware latencies. So flush
+ * out any pending IPI callbacks explicitly,
+ * to ensure that the outgoing CPU doesn't go
+ * offline with work still pending (during
+ * CPU hotplug).
+ */
+ flush_smp_call_function_queue();
break;
case MULTI_STOP_RUN:
if (is_active)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists