[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5375311B.2010202@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 23:26:51 +0200
From: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>
To: Chander Kashyap <chander.kashyap@...aro.org>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
CC: daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, lorenzo.pieralisi@....com,
rjw@...ysocki.net, kgene.kim@...sung.com,
Chander Kashyap <k.chander@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/6] exynos: cpuidle: do not allow cpuidle registration
for Exynos5420
Hi Chander,
On 14.05.2014 10:03, Chander Kashyap wrote:
> Exynos5420 is big.Little Soc. It uses cpuidle-big-litle generic cpuidle driver.
> Hence do not allow exynos cpuidle driver registration for Exynos5420.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap <chander.kashyap@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap <k.chander@...sung.com>
> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c
> index 3dd385e..807a386 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c
> @@ -218,6 +218,9 @@ static int exynos_cpuidle_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> int cpu_id, ret;
> struct cpuidle_device *device;
>
> + if (soc_is_exynos5420())
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> if (soc_is_exynos5250())
> exynos5_core_down_clk();
>
>
Why not put this in exynos.c in exynos_dt_machine_init(), so
exynos_cpuidle_init() is called only if not running on Exynos5420?
Best regards,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists