[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140515221624.GY26353@dastard>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 08:16:24 +1000
From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: Mateusz Guzik <mguzik@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
Eric Sandeen <esandeen@...hat.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] fs: print a message when freezing/unfreezing
filesystems
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 12:13:56PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Thu 15-05-14 08:37:45, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 08:00:52AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 01:39:45PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > > On Wed 14-05-14 13:26:21, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 01:14:49PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > > > > On Wed 14-05-14 00:04:43, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > > > > > > This helps hang troubleshooting efforts when only dmesg is available.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > While here remove code duplication with MS_RDONLY case and fix a
> > > > > > > whitespace nit.
> > > > > > I'm somewhat undecided here I have to say. On one hand I don't like
> > > > > > printing to kernel log when everything is fine and kernel is operating
> > > > > > normally. On the other hand I've seen quite a few cases where people have
> > > > > > shot themselves in the foot with filesystem freezing so having some trace
> > > > > > of this in the log doesn't seem like a completely bad thing either. What do
> > > > > > other people think?
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I would like to note that the kernel already prints messages when e.g.
> > > > > filesystems get mounted.
> > > > Yeah, that's a fair point.
> > >
> > > But filesystems choose to output that info, not the VFS. When you do
> > > a remount,ro there is no output in syslog, because filesystems don't
> > > need to dump any output - the state change is reflected in
> > > /proc/self/mounts. IMO frozen should state should be communicated
> > > the same way so that it is silent when it just works, and the state
> > > can easily be determined when something goes wrong.
> >
> > Say, like this:
> >
> > $ grep /mnt/test /proc/mounts
> > /dev/vda /mnt/test xfs rw,relatime,attr2,inode64,noquota 0 0
> > $ sudo xfs_freeze -f /mnt/test
> > $ grep /mnt/test /proc/mounts
> > /dev/vda /mnt/test xfs rw,frozen,relatime,attr2,inode64,noquota 0 0
> > $ sudo xfs_freeze -u /mnt/test
> > $ grep /mnt/test /proc/mounts
> > /dev/vda /mnt/test xfs rw,relatime,attr2,inode64,noquota 0 0
> > $
> >
> > Patch below does this.
> Hum, same as Eric I'm not very enthusiastic about a fake mount option in
> /proc/mounts. Maybe we could stuff some extra field in /proc/self/mountinfo?
sure - I'd forgotten about /proc/self/mountinfo, but the way i wrote
the patch will also dump the information into it. It's just a case
of moving the code to show_mountinfo() rather than show_sb_opts().
If that's acceptible for everyone, then I'll update the patch to do
that....
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists