| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <5375FCBD.7010700@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 13:55:41 +0200
From: Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>
To: Michael Mueller <mimu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, qemu-devel@...gnu.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
Andreas Faerber <afaerber@...e.de>,
"Jason J. Herne" <jjherne@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 RFC 3/6] KVM: s390: use facilities and cpu_id per KVM
On 13.05.14 16:58, Michael Mueller wrote:
> The patch introduces facilities and cpu_ids per virtual machine.
> Different virtual machines may want to expose different facilities and
> cpu ids to the guest, so let's make them per-vm instead of global.
>
> In addition this patch renames all ocurrences of *facilities to *fac_list
> smilar to the already exiting symbol stfl_fac_list in lowcore.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 7 +++
> arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c | 4 +-
> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h | 23 +++++++--
> arch/s390/kvm/priv.c | 13 +++--
> 5 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 38d487a..b4751ba 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -414,6 +414,12 @@ struct kvm_s390_config {
> struct kvm_s390_attr_name name;
> };
>
> +struct kvm_s390_cpu_model {
> + unsigned long *sie_fac;
> + struct cpuid cpu_id;
> + unsigned long *fac_list;
> +};
> +
> struct kvm_arch{
> struct sca_block *sca;
> debug_info_t *dbf;
> @@ -427,6 +433,7 @@ struct kvm_arch{
> wait_queue_head_t ipte_wq;
> struct kvm_s390_config *cfg;
> spinlock_t start_stop_lock;
> + struct kvm_s390_cpu_model model;
> };
>
> #define KVM_HVA_ERR_BAD (-1UL)
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
> index db608c3..4c7ca40 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
> @@ -358,8 +358,8 @@ static unsigned long guest_translate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gva,
> union asce asce;
>
> ctlreg0.val = vcpu->arch.sie_block->gcr[0];
> - edat1 = ctlreg0.edat && test_vfacility(8);
> - edat2 = edat1 && test_vfacility(78);
> + edat1 = ctlreg0.edat && test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 8);
> + edat2 = edat1 && test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 78);
> asce.val = get_vcpu_asce(vcpu);
> if (asce.r)
> goto real_address;
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> index 01a5212..a53652f 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
> /*
> - * hosting zSeries kernel virtual machines
> + * Hosting zSeries kernel virtual machines
> *
> * Copyright IBM Corp. 2008, 2009
> *
> @@ -30,7 +30,6 @@
> #include <asm/pgtable.h>
> #include <asm/nmi.h>
> #include <asm/switch_to.h>
> -#include <asm/facility.h>
> #include <asm/sclp.h>
> #include<asm/timex.h>
> #include "kvm-s390.h"
> @@ -92,15 +91,33 @@ struct kvm_stats_debugfs_item debugfs_entries[] = {
> { NULL }
> };
>
> -unsigned long *vfacilities;
> -static struct gmap_notifier gmap_notifier;
> +/* upper facilities limit for kvm */
> +unsigned long kvm_s390_fac_list_mask[] = {
> + 0xff82fff3f47c2000UL,
> + 0x005c000000000000UL,
> +};
> +
> +unsigned long kvm_s390_fac_list_mask_size(void)
> +{
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(kvm_s390_fac_list_mask) >
> + S390_ARCH_FAC_MASK_SIZE_U64);
> + return ARRAY_SIZE(kvm_s390_fac_list_mask);
> +}
>
> -/* test availability of vfacility */
> -int test_vfacility(unsigned long nr)
> +void kvm_s390_apply_fac_list_mask(unsigned long fac_list[])
> {
> - return __test_facility(nr, (void *) vfacilities);
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < S390_ARCH_FAC_LIST_SIZE_U64; i++) {
> + if (i < kvm_s390_fac_list_mask_size())
> + fac_list[i] &= kvm_s390_fac_list_mask[i];
> + else
> + fac_list[i] &= 0UL;
> + }
> }
>
> +static struct gmap_notifier gmap_notifier;
> +
> /* Section: not file related */
> int kvm_arch_hardware_enable(void *garbage)
> {
> @@ -485,6 +502,30 @@ long kvm_arch_vm_ioctl(struct file *filp,
> return r;
> }
>
> +/* make sure the memory used for fac_list is zeroed */
> +void kvm_s390_get_hard_fac_list(unsigned long *fac_list, int size)
Hard? Wouldn't "host" make more sense here?
I also think it makes sense to expose the native host facility list to
user space via an ioctl somehow.
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists