[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <537606A1.9080507@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 15:37:53 +0300
From: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC: Sundar Iyer <sundar.iyer@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: baytrail: Add pull type, strength and open drain
to debugfs output
On 05/16/2014 12:18 PM, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> In case of resolving power management or similar issues it might be useful
> to have these properties included in the debugfs output.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Looks good to me
Acked-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>
-Mathias
> ---
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c
> index 7c65c9dab215..975572e2f260 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c
> @@ -43,9 +43,20 @@
> #define BYT_INT_STAT_REG 0x800
>
> /* BYT_CONF0_REG register bits */
> +#define BYT_IODEN BIT(31)
> #define BYT_TRIG_NEG BIT(26)
> #define BYT_TRIG_POS BIT(25)
> #define BYT_TRIG_LVL BIT(24)
> +#define BYT_PULL_STR_SHIFT 9
> +#define BYT_PULL_STR_MASK (3 << BYT_PULL_STR_SHIFT)
> +#define BYT_PULL_STR_2K (0 << BYT_PULL_STR_SHIFT)
> +#define BYT_PULL_STR_10K (1 << BYT_PULL_STR_SHIFT)
> +#define BYT_PULL_STR_20K (2 << BYT_PULL_STR_SHIFT)
> +#define BYT_PULL_STR_40K (3 << BYT_PULL_STR_SHIFT)
> +#define BYT_PULL_ASSIGN_SHIFT 7
> +#define BYT_PULL_ASSIGN_MASK (3 << BYT_PULL_ASSIGN_SHIFT)
> +#define BYT_PULL_ASSIGN_UP (1 << BYT_PULL_ASSIGN_SHIFT)
> +#define BYT_PULL_ASSIGN_DOWN (2 << BYT_PULL_ASSIGN_SHIFT)
> #define BYT_PIN_MUX 0x07
>
> /* BYT_VAL_REG register bits */
> @@ -321,6 +332,8 @@ static void byt_gpio_dbg_show(struct seq_file *s, struct gpio_chip *chip)
> spin_lock_irqsave(&vg->lock, flags);
>
> for (i = 0; i < vg->chip.ngpio; i++) {
> + const char *pull_str = NULL;
> + const char *pull = NULL;
> const char *label;
> offs = vg->range->pins[i] * 16;
> conf0 = readl(vg->reg_base + offs + BYT_CONF0_REG);
> @@ -330,8 +343,32 @@ static void byt_gpio_dbg_show(struct seq_file *s, struct gpio_chip *chip)
> if (!label)
> label = "Unrequested";
>
> + switch (conf0 & BYT_PULL_ASSIGN_MASK) {
> + case BYT_PULL_ASSIGN_UP:
> + pull = "up";
> + break;
> + case BYT_PULL_ASSIGN_DOWN:
> + pull = "down";
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + switch (conf0 & BYT_PULL_STR_MASK) {
> + case BYT_PULL_STR_2K:
> + pull_str = "2k";
> + break;
> + case BYT_PULL_STR_10K:
> + pull_str = "10k";
> + break;
> + case BYT_PULL_STR_20K:
> + pull_str = "20k";
> + break;
> + case BYT_PULL_STR_40K:
> + pull_str = "40k";
> + break;
> + }
> +
> seq_printf(s,
> - " gpio-%-3d (%-20.20s) %s %s %s pad-%-3d offset:0x%03x mux:%d %s%s%s\n",
> + " gpio-%-3d (%-20.20s) %s %s %s pad-%-3d offset:0x%03x mux:%d %s%s%s",
> i,
> label,
> val & BYT_INPUT_EN ? " " : "in",
> @@ -339,9 +376,19 @@ static void byt_gpio_dbg_show(struct seq_file *s, struct gpio_chip *chip)
> val & BYT_LEVEL ? "hi" : "lo",
> vg->range->pins[i], offs,
> conf0 & 0x7,
> - conf0 & BYT_TRIG_NEG ? " fall" : "",
> - conf0 & BYT_TRIG_POS ? " rise" : "",
> - conf0 & BYT_TRIG_LVL ? " level" : "");
> + conf0 & BYT_TRIG_NEG ? " fall" : " ",
> + conf0 & BYT_TRIG_POS ? " rise" : " ",
> + conf0 & BYT_TRIG_LVL ? " level" : " ");
> +
> + if (pull && pull_str)
> + seq_printf(s, " %-4s %-3s", pull, pull_str);
> + else
> + seq_puts(s, " ");
> +
> + if (conf0 & BYT_IODEN)
> + seq_puts(s, " open-drain");
> +
> + seq_puts(s, "\n");
> }
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vg->lock, flags);
> }
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists