| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20140516180945.588563ec@bee>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 18:09:45 +0200
From: Michael Mueller <mimu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>
Cc: linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>, qemu-devel@...gnu.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
"Jason J. Herne" <jjherne@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Andreas Faerber <afaerber@...e.de>,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 RFC 3/6] KVM: s390: use facilities and
cpu_id per KVM
On Fri, 16 May 2014 16:49:37 +0200
Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de> wrote:
>
> On 16.05.14 16:46, Michael Mueller wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 May 2014 13:55:41 +0200
> > Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de> wrote:
> >
> >> On 13.05.14 16:58, Michael Mueller wrote:
> >>> The patch introduces facilities and cpu_ids per virtual machine.
> >>> Different virtual machines may want to expose different facilities and
> >>> cpu ids to the guest, so let's make them per-vm instead of global.
> >>>
> >>> In addition this patch renames all ocurrences of *facilities to *fac_list
> >>> smilar to the already exiting symbol stfl_fac_list in lowcore.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >>> Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 7 +++
> >>> arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c | 4 +-
> >>> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> >>> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h | 23 +++++++--
> >>> arch/s390/kvm/priv.c | 13 +++--
> >>> 5 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> >>> index 38d487a..b4751ba 100644
> >>> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> >>> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> >>> @@ -414,6 +414,12 @@ struct kvm_s390_config {
> >>> struct kvm_s390_attr_name name;
> >>> };
> >>>
> >>> +struct kvm_s390_cpu_model {
> >>> + unsigned long *sie_fac;
> >>> + struct cpuid cpu_id;
> >>> + unsigned long *fac_list;
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>> struct kvm_arch{
> >>> struct sca_block *sca;
> >>> debug_info_t *dbf;
> >>> @@ -427,6 +433,7 @@ struct kvm_arch{
> >>> wait_queue_head_t ipte_wq;
> >>> struct kvm_s390_config *cfg;
> >>> spinlock_t start_stop_lock;
> >>> + struct kvm_s390_cpu_model model;
> >>> };
> >>>
> >>> #define KVM_HVA_ERR_BAD (-1UL)
> >>> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
> >>> index db608c3..4c7ca40 100644
> >>> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
> >>> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
> >>> @@ -358,8 +358,8 @@ static unsigned long guest_translate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned
> >>> long gva, union asce asce;
> >>>
> >>> ctlreg0.val = vcpu->arch.sie_block->gcr[0];
> >>> - edat1 = ctlreg0.edat && test_vfacility(8);
> >>> - edat2 = edat1 && test_vfacility(78);
> >>> + edat1 = ctlreg0.edat && test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 8);
> >>> + edat2 = edat1 && test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 78);
> >>> asce.val = get_vcpu_asce(vcpu);
> >>> if (asce.r)
> >>> goto real_address;
> >>> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> >>> index 01a5212..a53652f 100644
> >>> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> >>> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> >>> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
> >>> /*
> >>> - * hosting zSeries kernel virtual machines
> >>> + * Hosting zSeries kernel virtual machines
> >>> *
> >>> * Copyright IBM Corp. 2008, 2009
> >>> *
> >>> @@ -30,7 +30,6 @@
> >>> #include <asm/pgtable.h>
> >>> #include <asm/nmi.h>
> >>> #include <asm/switch_to.h>
> >>> -#include <asm/facility.h>
> >>> #include <asm/sclp.h>
> >>> #include<asm/timex.h>
> >>> #include "kvm-s390.h"
> >>> @@ -92,15 +91,33 @@ struct kvm_stats_debugfs_item debugfs_entries[] = {
> >>> { NULL }
> >>> };
> >>>
> >>> -unsigned long *vfacilities;
> >>> -static struct gmap_notifier gmap_notifier;
> >>> +/* upper facilities limit for kvm */
> >>> +unsigned long kvm_s390_fac_list_mask[] = {
> >>> + 0xff82fff3f47c2000UL,
> >>> + 0x005c000000000000UL,
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>> +unsigned long kvm_s390_fac_list_mask_size(void)
> >>> +{
> >>> + BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(kvm_s390_fac_list_mask) >
> >>> + S390_ARCH_FAC_MASK_SIZE_U64);
> >>> + return ARRAY_SIZE(kvm_s390_fac_list_mask);
> >>> +}
> >>>
> >>> -/* test availability of vfacility */
> >>> -int test_vfacility(unsigned long nr)
> >>> +void kvm_s390_apply_fac_list_mask(unsigned long fac_list[])
> >>> {
> >>> - return __test_facility(nr, (void *) vfacilities);
> >>> + unsigned int i;
> >>> +
> >>> + for (i = 0; i < S390_ARCH_FAC_LIST_SIZE_U64; i++) {
> >>> + if (i < kvm_s390_fac_list_mask_size())
> >>> + fac_list[i] &= kvm_s390_fac_list_mask[i];
> >>> + else
> >>> + fac_list[i] &= 0UL;
> >>> + }
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> +static struct gmap_notifier gmap_notifier;
> >>> +
> >>> /* Section: not file related */
> >>> int kvm_arch_hardware_enable(void *garbage)
> >>> {
> >>> @@ -485,6 +502,30 @@ long kvm_arch_vm_ioctl(struct file *filp,
> >>> return r;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> +/* make sure the memory used for fac_list is zeroed */
> >>> +void kvm_s390_get_hard_fac_list(unsigned long *fac_list, int size)
> >> Hard? Wouldn't "host" make more sense here?
> > Renaming "*hard_fac_list" with "*host_fac_list" here and wherever it appears is ok with me.
> >
> >> I also think it makes sense to expose the native host facility list to
> >> user space via an ioctl somehow.
> >>
> > In which situation do you need the full facility list. Do you have an example?
>
> If you want to just implement -cpu host to get the exact feature set
> that the host gives you, how do you know which set that is?
During qemu machine initalization I call:
kvm_s390_get_machine_props(&mach);
which returns the following information:
typedef struct S390MachineProps {
uint64_t cpuid;
uint32_t ibc_range;
uint8_t pad[4];
uint64_t fac_mask[S390_ARCH_FAC_MASK_SIZE_UINT64];
uint64_t hard_fac_list[S390_ARCH_FAC_LIST_SIZE_UINT64];
uint64_t soft_fac_list[S390_ARCH_FAC_LIST_SIZE_UINT64];
} S390MachineProps;
In addition, user space has a model that defines which CPU facility became available in
regard to the CPU model (TYPE-GA#).
Let Fn be the CPU facility set of an arbitrary machine type, Mh and Fh the facility mask and list
of the current host. Then I just calculate Fn & Mh and match it with Fh (Fh is STFLE & Mh). All
machines where Fn is a full or partial subset are allowed as cpu models, the latest/newest of them
represents "host".
That is basically all done in use space routine:
s390_setup_cpu_classes(S390MachineProps *prop);
>
>
> Alex
>
>
Michael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists