linux-kernel - Re: 3.14.4 Kernel BUG at fs/namei.c : KDE's kate + ecryptfs + BTRFS + LVM2 + LUKS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 16 May 2014 20:16:41 +0530
From:	Ritesh Raj Sarraf <rrs@...earchut.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 3.14.4 Kernel BUG at fs/namei.c : KDE's kate + ecryptfs + BTRFS
 + LVM2 + LUKS


On 05/16/2014 06:36 PM, Swâmi Petaramesh wrote:
> Underlying is ecryptfs over BTRFS over LVM2 over LUKS (what else ?)

I recently switched one of my drives to BTRFS because I wanted
transparent compression. Since I also needed encryption, I chose:

BTRFS => LUKS (Device Mapper) => SCSI Block.

Is there any value having LVM2 and ecryptfs in the way you have stacked
? Just curious.

-- 
Given the large number of mailing lists I follow, I request you to CC me
in replies for quicker response

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/