linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Implement free_opp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKohpokCBbL1OkxB3rh0Pr3yqiG1H6UsZgD-WQTRvihxJt1-Qw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 16 May 2014 22:41:49 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	Inderpal Singh <inderpal.s@...sung.com>
Cc:	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Implement free_opp_table function

On 16 May 2014 22:38, Inderpal Singh <inderpal.s@...sung.com> wrote:
>>> +       while (!list_empty(&dev_opp->opp_list)) {
>>> +               opp = list_entry_rcu(dev_opp->opp_list.next,
>>> +                                       struct dev_pm_opp, node);
>>
>> list_for_each_entry_rcu ?
>>
>
> list_for_each_entry_rcu can not be used as opp is being deleted in the loop.

So what? The above code can be replaced easily I think.
This is how it is implemented:

#define list_for_each_entry_rcu(pos, head, member) \
        for (pos = list_entry_rcu((head)->next, typeof(*pos), member); \
                &pos->member != (head); \
                pos = list_entry_rcu(pos->member.next, typeof(*pos), member))
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/