[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <xa1tppjdfwif.fsf@mina86.com>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 10:45:12 -0700
From: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>
To: Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@....com>, Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@....com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Laura Abbott <lauraa@...eaurora.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Heesub Shin <heesub.shin@...sung.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
이건호 <gunho.lee@....com>, gurugio@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] CMA: drivers/base/Kconfig: restrict CMA size to non-zero value
On Fri, May 16 2014, Gioh Kim wrote:
> If CMA_SIZE_MBYTES is allowed to be zero, there should be defense code
> to check CMA is initlaized correctly. And atomic_pool initialization
> should be done by __alloc_remap_buffer instead of
> __alloc_from_contiguous if __alloc_from_contiguous is failed.
Agreed, and this is the correct fix.
> IMPO, it is more simple and powerful to restrict CMA_SIZE_MBYTES_MAX
> configuration to be larger than zero.
No, because it makes it impossible to have CMA disabled by default and
only enabled if command line argument is given.
Furthermore, your patch does *not* guarantee CMA region to always be
allocated. If CMA_SIZE_SEL_PERCENTAGE is selected for instance. Or if
user explicitly passes 0 on command line.
--
Best regards, _ _
.o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science, Michał “mina86” Nazarewicz (o o)
ooo +--<mpn@...gle.com>--<xmpp:mina86@...ber.org>--ooO--(_)--Ooo--
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (836 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists