linux-kernel - [BUG] might sleep functions in atomic context in stmmac

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <53769C2A.8050803@ispras.ru>
Date:	Sat, 17 May 2014 03:15:54 +0400
From:	Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@...ras.ru>
To:	Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...com>
CC:	Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	ldv-project@...uxtesting.org
Subject: [BUG] might sleep functions in atomic context in stmmac_resume()

There are calls to might sleep functions in atomic context in
stmmac_resume():
- the first one is clk_prepare_enable(priv->stmmac_clk);
- the second one is stmmac_hw_setup()
-> init_dma_desc_rings()
  -> stmmac_init_rx_buffers()
    -> __netdev_alloc_skb(GFP_KERNEL)

What is the purpose of spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, flags) section?
What does it protect against?

Found by Linux Driver Verification project (linuxtesting.org).

--
Alexey Khoroshilov
Linux Verification Center, ISPRAS
web: http://linuxtesting.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/