lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 16 May 2014 17:56:43 -0700
From:	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
	Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>,
	Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
	Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] [RFC] timekeeping: Use cached ntp_tick_length when accumulating error

By caching the ntp_tick_length() when we correct the frequency error,
and then using that cached value to accumulate error, we avoid large
initial errors when the tick length is changed.

This makes convergence happen much faster in the simulator, since the
initial error doesn't have to be slowly whittled away.

This initially seems like an accounting error, but Miroslav pointed out
that ntp_tick_length() can change mid-tick, so when we apply it in the
error accumulation, we are applying any recent change to the entire tick.

This approach chooses to apply changes in the ntp_tick_length() only to
the next tick, which allows us to calculate the freq correction before
using the new tick length, which avoids accumulating error.

Credit to Miroslav for pointing this out and providing the original patch
this functionality has been pulled out from, along with the rational.

Cc: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
Reported-by: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
---
 include/linux/timekeeper_internal.h | 7 +++++++
 kernel/time/timekeeping.c           | 5 ++++-
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/timekeeper_internal.h b/include/linux/timekeeper_internal.h
index 4d398f1..4fddf6c 100644
--- a/include/linux/timekeeper_internal.h
+++ b/include/linux/timekeeper_internal.h
@@ -34,6 +34,13 @@ struct timekeeper {
 	/* Clock shifted nano seconds */
 	u64			xtime_nsec;
 
+	/* The ntp_tick_length() value currently being used.
+	 * This cached copy ensures we consistently apply the tick
+	 * length for an entire tick, as ntp_tick_length may change
+	 * mid-tick, and we don't want to apply that new value to
+	 * the tick in progress.
+	 */
+	u64			ntp_tick;
 	/* Difference between accumulated time and NTP time in ntp
 	 * shifted nano seconds. */
 	s64			ntp_error;
diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
index d46bda2..846603e 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -141,6 +141,7 @@ static void tk_setup_internals(struct timekeeper *tk, struct clocksource *clock)
 
 	tk->ntp_error = 0;
 	tk->ntp_error_shift = NTP_SCALE_SHIFT - clock->shift;
+	tk->ntp_tick = ntpinterval << tk->ntp_error_shift;
 
 	/*
 	 * The timekeeper keeps its own mult values for the currently
@@ -1144,6 +1145,8 @@ static __always_inline void timekeeping_freqadjust(struct timekeeper *tk,
 	if (tk->ntp_err_mult)
 		xinterval -= tk->cycle_interval;
 
+	tk->ntp_tick = ntp_tick_length();
+
 	/* Calculate current error per tick */
 	tick_error = ntp_tick_length() >> tk->ntp_error_shift;
 	tick_error -= (xinterval + tk->xtime_remainder);
@@ -1289,7 +1292,7 @@ static cycle_t logarithmic_accumulation(struct timekeeper *tk, cycle_t offset,
 	tk->raw_time.tv_nsec = raw_nsecs;
 
 	/* Accumulate error between NTP and clock interval */
-	tk->ntp_error += ntp_tick_length() << shift;
+	tk->ntp_error += tk->ntp_tick << shift;
 	tk->ntp_error -= (tk->xtime_interval + tk->xtime_remainder) <<
 						(tk->ntp_error_shift + shift);
 
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ