[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140517225339.GJ16255@mwanda>
Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 01:53:39 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, Emil Goode <emilgoode@...il.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...escale.com>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: imx: fix error handling in ipu device
registration
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 11:35:55PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 01:08:36AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > Let's look at that error handling again.
> >
> > err: <-- the name is not descriptive. the location is bad.
> > kfree(pdev->dev.dma_mask); <- null dereference.
> > platform_device_put(pdev); <- ok
> > return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV); <- should be "return ERR_PTR(ret);"
> >
> > 3 out of 4 of the lines are bad.
>
> 2 out of 4. kfree(NULL) is perfectly legal.
pdev was NULL though...
The bug is *caused* by trying to use the same "err" label to do all
error handling. This is a very common anti-patern, but if you follow
canonical kernel style then your error handling is less buggy.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists