linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] kref: warn on uninitialized kref

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <53776918.7040402@acm.org>
Date:	Sat, 17 May 2014 15:50:16 +0200
From:	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To:	Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
	Mateusz Guzik <mguzik@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC:	"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, target-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kref: warn on uninitialized kref

On 05/17/14 14:38, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> I found a memory leak in iSCSI target that was caused by kref initialized
> to zero (the memory object was allocated with kzalloc, kref_init was not
> called and kref_put_spinlock_irqsave was called which changed "0" to "-1"
> and didn't free the object).
> 
> Similar bugs may exist in other kernel areas, so I submit this patch that
> adds a check to kref.h. If the value is zero or negative, we can assume
> that it is uninitialized and we warn about it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
> 
> ---
>  include/linux/kref.h |    4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> Index: linux-3.15-rc5/include/linux/kref.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-3.15-rc5.orig/include/linux/kref.h	2014-05-16 19:00:18.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-3.15-rc5/include/linux/kref.h	2014-05-17 13:19:31.000000000 +0200
> @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ static inline int kref_sub(struct kref *
>  	     void (*release)(struct kref *kref))
>  {
>  	WARN_ON(release == NULL);
> -
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&kref->refcount) < (int)count);
>  	if (atomic_sub_and_test((int) count, &kref->refcount)) {
>  		release(kref);
>  		return 1;
> @@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ static inline int kref_put_spinlock_irqs
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  
>  	WARN_ON(release == NULL);
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&kref->refcount) <= 0);
>  	if (atomic_add_unless(&kref->refcount, -1, 1))
>  		return 0;
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags);
> @@ -136,6 +137,7 @@ static inline int kref_put_mutex(struct 
>  				 struct mutex *lock)
>  {
>  	WARN_ON(release == NULL);
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&kref->refcount) <= 0);
>  	if (unlikely(!atomic_add_unless(&kref->refcount, -1, 1))) {
>  		mutex_lock(lock);
>  		if (unlikely(!atomic_dec_and_test(&kref->refcount))) {

This patch adds two conditional branches and one atomic read to
kref_sub(). What is the performance impact of this patch on kernel code
that uses kref_put() in the hot path ? Has it been considered to enable
the newly added code only if a CONFIG_DEBUG_* macro has been set ?

Bart.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/