[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAvxhqD0zS9+W0Jx3Ut+MQfCWzMmSDwdo+t9mEaL655BRT8qGg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 20:12:39 +0100
From: Masaru Nomura <massa.nomura@...il.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, andreas.dilger@...el.com,
oleg.drokin@...el.com, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] staging: lustre: lnet: socklnd: Clean up memset(...)
>> - memset (peer, 0, sizeof (*peer)); /* NULL pointers/clear flags etc */
>> + memset(peer, 0, sizeof(*peer)); /* NULL pointers/clear flags etc */
>
> It looks like this memset is unnecessary
> as it's already zeroed by LIBCFS_ALLOC->
> LIBCFS_ALLOC_GFP->LIBCFS_ALLOC_POST->memset.
>
> It seems as if all these ALLOC macros could
> use quite a bit of cleaning/sorting out.
Thank you for pointing it out. I didn't know that nor check the macros.
I'll care about similar problems next time.
I checked the macros and kind of understand what you mean,
but honestly I'm not sure whether or not it's perfectly correct to
remove memset.
If this is the right way, I think we can remove the following memset
which I modified as well.
The reason is the same as you mentioned. conn is zeroed by
LIBCFS_ALLOC before memset.
[PATCH 1/5]
@@ -1041,26 +1041,26 @@ ksocknal_create_conn (lnet_ni_t *ni,
ksock_route_t *route,
goto failed_0;
}
- memset (conn, 0, sizeof (*conn));
+ memset(conn, 0, sizeof(*conn));
Thank you,
Masaru
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists