[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140518191338.GA11754@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>
Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 20:13:38 +0100
From: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
To: Thomas Meyer <thomas@...3r.de>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
"intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] 3.15-rc5: Regression in i915 driver?
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 09:08:40PM +0200, Thomas Meyer wrote:
> Am Montag, den 12.05.2014, 07:33 +0100 schrieb Chris Wilson:
> > On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 07:40:57PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com> wrote:
> > > > On 11 May 2014 18:28, Thomas Meyer <thomas@...3r.de> wrote:
> > > >> Hi,
> > > >>
> > > >> 3.14.3 works as expected.
> > > >> 3.15-rc5 shows a strange behaviour: When resuming from ram the X server
> > > >> seems to be disfunctional.
> > > >>
> > > >> I see this WARNING in the kernel log before suspend to ram in the early
> > > >> boot process:
> > >
> > > Doesn't ring a bell really.
> >
> > Same symptoms as
> > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76554
> > -Chris
> >
>
> bisected this to:
> # first bad commit: [78f2975eec9faff353a6194e854d3d39907bab68] drm/i915: Move all ring resets before setting the HWS page
>
> commit 78f2975eec9faff353a6194e854d3d39907bab68
> Author: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
> Date: Wed Apr 2 16:36:07 2014 +0100
>
> drm/i915: Move all ring resets before setting the HWS page
>
> In commit a51435a3137ad8ae75c288c39bd2d8b2696bae8f
> Author: Naresh Kumar Kachhi <naresh.kumar.kachhi@...el.com>
> Date: Wed Mar 12 16:39:40 2014 +0530
>
> drm/i915: disable rings before HW status page setup
>
> we reordered stopping the rings to do so before we set the HWS register.
> However, there is an extra workaround for g45 to reset the rings twice,
> and for consistency we should apply that workaround before setting the
> HWS to be sure that the rings are truly stopped.
>
> Reference: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140423202248.GA3621@amd.pavel.ucw.cz
> Tested-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
> Cc: Naresh Kumar Kachhi <naresh.kumar.kachhi@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
> Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>
>
> Reverting above commit from current linus' master tree makes the display server behave correctly after resume from ram.
Boot time regression trumps resume regression? Doubly-so as we have an
earlier resume regression with identical symptoms?
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists