[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5378764C.5050601@linux.intel.com>
Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 16:58:52 +0800
From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
sfi-devel@...plefirmware.org
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch Part1 V1 00/30] use irqdomain to dynamically allocate
IRQ for IOAPIC pin
On 2014/5/16 23:01, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 1:05 AM, Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>> On x86 platforms, IRQ number are statically allocated to IOAPIC pins at boot.
>> There are two issues with this design. First it causes trouble to IOAPIC
>> hotplug because we need to allocate a block of IRQ numbers for each IOAPIC.
>> Second it may waste IRQ nubmers even if some IOAPIC pins are not used because
>> IRQ numbers are statically assigned.
>>
>> This patchset tries to enable dynamic IRQ number allocation for IOAPIC
>> by adopting the irqdomain framework, it solves the two issues mentioned
>> above. It also simplifies the IOAPIC driver by consolidating ways to
>> program IOAPIC pins with the irqdomain map interface.
>>
>> We will enhance the IOAPIC driver core to support ACPI based IOAPIC hotplug
>> once the IOAPIC driver has been converted to irqdomain.
>>
>> This patchset applies to v3.15-rc4-260-g38583f095c5a and has been tested
>> on a two socket 64 bit Intel platforms with:
>> 1) ACPI and mpparse enabled (boot successfully)
>> 2) Mpparse enabled with ACPI disabled (boot successfully)
>> 3) ACPI enabled with Mpparse disabled (boot successfully)
>
> Great. I don't need to look into using irqdomain for x86 by myself.
>
> Thomas put some irq clean up patches in tip irq branch.
>
> Can you rebase your irqdomain/for x86 on top of that?
> Also would be better if you can put your patches in git branch.
Hi Yinghai,
I have rebased to tip/irq/core branch and will send out new patch set
after basic tests. I have no account at kernel.org, so will
try to setup a gate on github next time.
Thanks!
>
> Thanks
>
> Yinghai
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists