[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADGdYn5z8QYDrpA771fSqBZVX4=3q6ig4RU+XHP44qaUpPO_Jg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 11:20:51 +0530
From: Amit Kachhap <amit.kachhap@...il.com>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@...com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] thermal: exynos: remove redundant threshold_code
checks from exynos_tmu_initialize()
On 5/5/14, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com> wrote:
> Remove runtime checks for negative return values of temp_to_code()
> from exynos_tmu_initialize(). The current level temperature data
> hardcoded in pdata will never cause a negative temp_to_code()
> return values and for the new code potential mistakes should be
> caught during development/review phases.
Your arguments looks fine.
>
> Theres should be no functional changes caused by this patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
> ---
> drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c | 16 +---------------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> index 789d745..a415829 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> @@ -170,10 +170,6 @@ static int exynos_tmu_initialize(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS4210) {
> /* Write temperature code for threshold */
> threshold_code = temp_to_code(data, pdata->threshold);
> - if (threshold_code < 0) {
> - ret = threshold_code;
> - goto out;
> - }
> writeb(threshold_code,
> data->base + reg->threshold_temp);
> for (i = 0; i < trigger_levs; i++)
> @@ -187,18 +183,12 @@ static int exynos_tmu_initialize(struct
> platform_device *pdev)
> i < trigger_levs && i < EXYNOS_MAX_TRIGGER_PER_REG; i++) {
> threshold_code = temp_to_code(data,
> pdata->trigger_levels[i]);
> - if (threshold_code < 0) {
> - ret = threshold_code;
> - goto out;
> - }
> rising_threshold |= threshold_code << 8 * i;
> if (pdata->threshold_falling) {
> threshold_code = temp_to_code(data,
> pdata->trigger_levels[i] -
> pdata->threshold_falling);
> - if (threshold_code > 0)
> - falling_threshold |=
> - threshold_code << 8 * i;
> + falling_threshold |= threshold_code << 8 * i;
> }
> }
>
> @@ -217,10 +207,6 @@ static int exynos_tmu_initialize(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> (pdata->trigger_type[i] == HW_TRIP)) {
> threshold_code = temp_to_code(data,
> pdata->trigger_levels[i]);
> - if (threshold_code < 0) {
> - ret = threshold_code;
> - goto out;
> - }
> if (i == EXYNOS_MAX_TRIGGER_PER_REG - 1) {
> /* 1-4 level to be assigned in th0 reg */
> rising_threshold |= threshold_code << 8 * i;
> --
> 1.8.2.3
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists