lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 20 May 2014 02:46:23 +0300
From:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Cc:	Saurav Kashyap <saurav.kashyap@...gic.com>,
	Dept-Eng QLA2xxx Upstream <qla2xxx-upstream@...gic.com>,
	"kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@...allels.com>,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/13 v2] [SCSI] qla2xxx: make return of 0 explicit

On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 07:36:48AM +0800, Julia Lawall wrote:
> 
> 
> On Mon, 19 May 2014, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 04:07:52PM +0000, Saurav Kashyap wrote:
> > > Hi Julia,
> > >
> > > Status is already set to 0 at the beginning of the function, I think
> > > we should just "return status" here to be consistent with the rest of
> > > the function.
> >
> > "return 0;" is more clear than "return status;".
> >
> > Consistency is great so long as it makes the code easier to read.  Don't
> > lose track of the real goal.
> 
> If status were an informative word, there might be a reason for it.  But
> integer typed functions almost always return their status, so there is no
> real information.

Just to be clear, I'm agreeing with you...  "return 0;" is better.

regards,
dan carpenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ