[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53795E3B.9000004@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 09:28:27 +0800
From: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@...wei.com>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mauro Chehab <m.chehab@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] time: Provide full featured jiffies_to_nsecs() function
On 2014/4/9 1:32, Tony Luck wrote:
> The "uptime" tracer added in:
> commit 8aacf017b065a805d27467843490c976835eb4a5
> tracing: Add "uptime" trace clock that uses jiffies
> has wraparound problems when the system has been up more
> than 1 hour 11 minutes and 34 seconds. It converts jiffies
> to nanoseconds using:
> (u64)jiffies_to_usecs(jiffy) * 1000ULL
> but since jiffies_to_usecs() only returns a 32-bit value, it
> truncates at 2^32 microseconds. An additional problem on 32-bit
> systems is that the argument is "unsigned long", so fixing the
> return value only helps until 2^32 jiffies (49.7 days on a HZ=1000
> system).
>
> So we provide a full featured jiffies_to_nsec() function that
> takes a "u64" argument and provides a "u64" result. To avoid
> cries of rage from the other user of this: scheduler_tick_max_deferment()
> we check whether the argument is small enough that we can do
> the calculations in 32-bit operations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
> ---
> include/linux/jiffies.h | 6 +-----
> kernel/time.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> kernel/timeconst.bc | 12 ++++++++++++
> kernel/trace/trace_clock.c | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
[...]
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_clock.c b/kernel/trace/trace_clock.c
> index 26dc348332b7..52470fba1d26 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_clock.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_clock.c
> @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ u64 notrace trace_clock_jiffies(void)
> u64 jiffy = jiffies - INITIAL_JIFFIES;
Hi Tony and Steven,
Another problem, maybe we should use get_jiffies_64() instead of jiffies
directly here OR we'll meet wraparound problems on 32bit system. But a
same problem is that the jiffies_lock is not safe in NMI context...
>
> /* Return nsecs */
> - return (u64)jiffies_to_usecs(jiffy) * 1000ULL;
> + return jiffies_to_nsecs(jiffy);
> }
>
> /*
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists