linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm/compaction: avoid rescanning pageblocks in isolate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5379D99E.1020302@suse.cz>
Date:	Mon, 19 May 2014 12:14:54 +0200
From:	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
CC:	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
	Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm/compaction: avoid rescanning pageblocks in
 isolate_freepages

I wonder why nobody complained about the build warning... sorry.

----8<----
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 12:02:38 +0200
Subject: mm-compaction-avoid-rescanning-pageblocks-in-isolate_freepages-fix
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Fix a (spurious) build warning:

mm/compaction.c:860:15: warning: ‘next_free_pfn’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]

Seems like the compiler cannot prove that exiting the for loop without updating
next_free_pfn there will mean that the check for crossing the scanners will
trigger. So let's not confuse people who try to see why this warning occurs.

Instead of initializing next_free_pfn to zero with an explaining comment, just
drop the damned variable altogether and work with cc->free_pfn directly as
Nayoa originally suggested.

Suggested-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
---
 mm/compaction.c | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
index 8db9820..b0f939b 100644
--- a/mm/compaction.c
+++ b/mm/compaction.c
@@ -760,7 +760,6 @@ static void isolate_freepages(struct zone *zone,
 	unsigned long block_start_pfn;	/* start of current pageblock */
 	unsigned long block_end_pfn;	/* end of current pageblock */
 	unsigned long low_pfn;	     /* lowest pfn scanner is able to scan */
-	unsigned long next_free_pfn; /* start pfn for scaning at next round */
 	int nr_freepages = cc->nr_freepages;
 	struct list_head *freelist = &cc->freepages;
 
@@ -822,7 +821,7 @@ static void isolate_freepages(struct zone *zone,
 			continue;
 
 		/* Found a block suitable for isolating free pages from */
-		next_free_pfn = block_start_pfn;
+		cc->free_pfn = block_start_pfn;
 		isolated = isolate_freepages_block(cc, block_start_pfn,
 					block_end_pfn, freelist, false);
 		nr_freepages += isolated;
@@ -852,9 +851,8 @@ static void isolate_freepages(struct zone *zone,
 	 * so that compact_finished() may detect this
 	 */
 	if (block_start_pfn < low_pfn)
-		next_free_pfn = cc->migrate_pfn;
+		cc->free_pfn = cc->migrate_pfn;
 
-	cc->free_pfn = next_free_pfn;
 	cc->nr_freepages = nr_freepages;
 }
 
-- 
1.8.4.5


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/