linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Aggressively allocate the pages on cma reserved memory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140519021234.GB19615@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE>
Date:	Mon, 19 May 2014 11:12:34 +0900
From:	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
To:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc:	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Laura Abbott <lauraa@...eaurora.org>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
	Heesub Shin <heesub.shin@...sung.com>,
	Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
	'Tomasz Stanislawski' <t.stanislaws@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Aggressively allocate the pages on cma reserved
 memory

On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 10:47:18AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:10:55AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > > That doesn't always prefer CMA region. It would be nice to
> > > understand why grouping in pageblock_nr_pages is beneficial. Also in
> > > your patch you decrement nr_try_cma for every 'order' allocation. Why ?
> > 
> > pageblock_nr_pages is just magic value with no rationale. :)
> 
> I'm not following this discussions closely but there is rational to that
> value -- it's the size of a huge page for that architecture.  At the time
> the fragmentation avoidance was implemented this was the largest allocation
> size of interest.

Hello,

Indeed. There is a such good rationale.
Really thanks for informing it.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/