linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 0/3] Exynos 5410 support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 19 May 2014 12:51:36 +0200
From:	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>
To:	Tarek Dakhran <t.dakhran@...sung.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC:	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
	Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
	Vyacheslav Tyrtov <v.tyrtov@...sung.com>,
	Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@...aro.org>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
	Romain Naour <romain.naour@...nwide.fr>,
	Chander Kashyap <chander.kashyap@...aro.org>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
	Tarek Dakhran <t.dakhran@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/3] Exynos 5410 support

Hi Tarek,

On 19.05.2014 05:37, Tarek Dakhran wrote:
> The series of patches represent support of Exynos 5410 SoC
> 
> The Exynos 5410 is the first Samsung SoC based on big.LITTLE architecture
> 
> Patches add new platform description, support of clock controller and device
> tree for Exynos 5410.
> 
> Has been build on Samsung Linux Kernel
>   (branch: for-next, commit: ccf5511 ARM: EXYNOS: Add MCPM call-back functions)

This doesn't look like an up-to-date tip of that branch. There was a lot
of changes merged 2 days ago, especially from samsung-clk tree and your
patches won't apply and/or compile (at least patch 2/3). Are you sure
you didn't have a git fetch error?

Moreover I can still see the dts using full-path syntax, instead of
reference-based one and also no soc node, as I pointed in v8. [1]

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/26/59

Another thing is that I still see a custom fixed clock binding being
used for oscclk in the clock driver, while I believe I pointed in some
of the previous versions that generic fixed clock should be used.

Best regards,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/