[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140519125738.GB9466@ulmo>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 14:57:39 +0200
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
santosh.shilimkar@...com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] of/irq: do irq resolution in
platform_get_irq_byname()
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 04:30:59PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
[...]
> diff --git a/drivers/of/irq.c b/drivers/of/irq.c
[...]
> /**
> + * of_irq_get_byname - Decode a node's IRQ and return it as a Linux irq number
> + * @dev: pointer to device tree node
> + * @name: zero-based index of the irq
This is a name, not an index.
> + *
> + * Returns Linux irq number on success, or -EPROBE_DEFER if the irq domain
> + * is not yet created, or errorno in case of failure.
s/errorno/error code/? Also EPROBE_DEFER is also an error code, so I'm
not sure if it's worth a special case in the description here.
> + *
> + */
> +int of_irq_get_byname(struct device_node *dev, const char *name)
> +{
> + const char *name_irq = NULL;
> + int index = 0;
> +
> + if (unlikely(!name))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + while (!of_property_read_string_index(dev, "interrupt-names",
> + index, &name_irq))
> + if (!strcmp(name, name_irq))
> + return of_irq_get(dev, index);
Isn't this missing an index++ somewhere? Otherwise it seems like this
would loop infinitely if there was no match on the first entry.
Thierry
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists