linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the akpm tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1400512396.2560.9.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net>
Date:	Mon, 19 May 2014 08:13:16 -0700
From:	Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the akpm tree

Hi Stephen,

On Mon, 2014-05-19 at 18:13 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> After merging the akpm tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) produced these warnings:
> 
> 
> ipc/ipcns_notifier.c:22:8: warning: excess elements in struct initializer [enabled by default]
> ipc/ipcns_notifier.c:22:8: warning: (near initialization for 'ipcns_chain.rwsem') [enabled by default]
> ipc/ipcns_notifier.c:22:8: warning: excess elements in struct initializer [enabled by default]
> ipc/ipcns_notifier.c:22:8: warning: (near initialization for 'ipcns_chain.rwsem') [enabled by default]
> 
> and many more in other files ...

Hmm are all the warning the same? Is this just on arm? have you seen it
in other archs? (Could you please send me the .config)

> Presumably a result of commit fe2038c57c03 ("rwsem: Support optimistic
> spinning").

If CONFIG_SMP, we add two new fields to the rwsem structure
(include/linux/rwsem.h) and likewise we update the
__RWSEM_INITIALIZER(name) macro. Afaict the only way to trigger
something like that is to be using the spinlock variant
(rwsem-spinlock.h).

The fix for that would be:

diff --git a/include/linux/rwsem.h b/include/linux/rwsem.h
index 3e108f1..091d993 100644
--- a/include/linux/rwsem.h
+++ b/include/linux/rwsem.h
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ static inline int rwsem_is_locked(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
 # define __RWSEM_DEP_MAP_INIT(lockname)
 #endif
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) && defined(CONFIG_RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM)
 #define __RWSEM_INITIALIZER(name)                      \
        { RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE,                         \
          __RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(name.wait_lock),     \



> I reverted that commit (and
> "rwsem-support-optimistic-spinning-checkpatch-fixes") for today.

This was picked up today by -tip maintainers, so I guess it should also
be removed from -mm.

Thanks,
Davidlohr


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/