linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] regulator: core: Fix the init of DT defined fixed regulators

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140519161838.GB12304@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Mon, 19 May 2014 17:18:38 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Alban Bedel <alban.bedel@...onic-design.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: core: Fix the init of DT defined fixed
 regulators

On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 05:25:56PM +0200, Alban Bedel wrote:

> Would checking that the regulator is at the voltage declared in the DT
> better? Or should I just add a pseudo set method to the regulator driver
> that only accept the current voltage? That could also be implemented at
> the core level using a default method for all regulators that have a get
> but no set method.

We already have code in the core to accept set_voltage() on fixed
voltage regulators - are you sure you're working with current code?
Otherwise fixing things to go through the standard set_voltage() path
would be OK.  There should be no need to add a dummy function for
setting.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)