[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <537A445E.5030604@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 10:50:22 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Armin Rigo <arigo@...es.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
CC: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Kenny Simpson <theonetruekenny@...il.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: remap_file_pages() use
On 05/19/2014 09:42 AM, Armin Rigo wrote:
> If there is an official way to know in advance how many remappings our
> process is allowed to perform, then we could adapt as the size
> increases. Or maybe catching ENOMEM and doubling the remapping size
> (in some process-wide synchronization point). All in all, thanks for
> the note: it looks like there are solutions (even if less elegant than
> remap_file_pages from the user's perspective).
We keep the current count as mm->map_count in the kernel, and the limit
is available because it's a sysctl. It wouldn't be hard to dump
mm->map_count out in a /proc file somewhere if it would be useful to
you. Would that work, or is there some other interface that would be
more convenient?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists