linux-kernel - [PATCH] uprobes: Shift ->readpage check from __copy_insn() to uprobe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140519184054.GA6750@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 19 May 2014 20:40:54 +0200
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] uprobes: Shift ->readpage check from __copy_insn() to
	uprobe_register()

Sorry for double-posting, but it seems that this patch didn't reach
lkml. Let me resend it just on case. Plus another patch in reply, on
top of this change.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: [PATCH] uprobes: Shift ->readpage check from __copy_insn() to uprobe_register()

copy_insn() fails with -EIO if ->readpage == NULL, but this error
is not propagated unless uprobe_register() path finds ->mm which
already mmaps this file. In this case (say) "perf record" does not
actually install the probe, but the user can't know about this.

Move this check into uprobe_register() so that this problem can be
detected earlier and reported to user.

Note: this is still not perfect,

	- copy_insn() and arch_uprobe_analyze_insn() should be called
	  by uprobe_register() but this is not simple, we need vm_file
	  for read_mapping_page() (although perhaps we can pass NULL),
	  and we need ->mm for is_64bit_mm() (although this logic is
	  broken anyway).

	- uprobe_register() should be called by create_trace_uprobe(),
	  not by probe_event_enable(), so that an error can be detected
	  at "perf probe -x" time. This also needs more changes in the
	  core uprobe code, uprobe register/unregister interface was
	  poorly designed from the very beginning.

Reported-by: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
---
 kernel/events/uprobes.c |    6 +++---
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index 3b02c72..c56b13e 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -536,9 +536,6 @@ static int __copy_insn(struct address_space *mapping, struct file *filp,
 			void *insn, int nbytes, loff_t offset)
 {
 	struct page *page;
-
-	if (!mapping->a_ops->readpage)
-		return -EIO;
 	/*
 	 * Ensure that the page that has the original instruction is
 	 * populated and in page-cache.
@@ -879,6 +876,9 @@ int uprobe_register(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, struct uprobe_consumer *
 	if (!uc->handler && !uc->ret_handler)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	/* copy_insn()->read_mapping_page() needs ->readpage() */
+	if (!inode->i_mapping->a_ops->readpage)
+		return -EIO;
 	/* Racy, just to catch the obvious mistakes */
 	if (offset > i_size_read(inode))
 		return -EINVAL;
-- 
1.5.5.1


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/