linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/13 v2] [SCSI] qla2xxx: make return of 0 explicit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140519201202.GA15585@mwanda>
Date:	Mon, 19 May 2014 23:12:02 +0300
From:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:	Saurav Kashyap <saurav.kashyap@...gic.com>
Cc:	Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>,
	Dept-Eng QLA2xxx Upstream <qla2xxx-upstream@...gic.com>,
	"kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@...allels.com>,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/13 v2] [SCSI] qla2xxx: make return of 0 explicit

On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 04:07:52PM +0000, Saurav Kashyap wrote:
> Hi Julia,
> 
> Status is already set to 0 at the beginning of the function, I think
> we should just "return status" here to be consistent with the rest of
> the function.

"return 0;" is more clear than "return status;".

Consistency is great so long as it makes the code easier to read.  Don't
lose track of the real goal.

regards,
dan carpenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/