[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140520165511.3f4bdc5d@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 16:55:11 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
<intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...onical.com>,
Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the dma-buf tree with the drm-intel
tree
Hi Sumit,
Today's linux-next merge of the dma-buf tree got a conflict in
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_dmabuf.c between commit 5cc9ed4b9a7a
("drm/i915: Introduce mapping of user pages into video memory (userptr)
ioctl") from the drm-intel tree and commit 8dfb1f0f8103 ("dma-buf: use
reservation objects") from the dma-buf tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_dmabuf.c
index 580aa42443ed,817ec444c976..000000000000
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_dmabuf.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_dmabuf.c
@@@ -229,15 -233,8 +229,16 @@@ static const struct dma_buf_ops i915_dm
struct dma_buf *i915_gem_prime_export(struct drm_device *dev,
struct drm_gem_object *gem_obj, int flags)
{
+ struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = to_intel_bo(gem_obj);
+
+ if (obj->ops->dmabuf_export) {
+ int ret = obj->ops->dmabuf_export(obj);
+ if (ret)
+ return ERR_PTR(ret);
+ }
+
- return dma_buf_export(gem_obj, &i915_dmabuf_ops, gem_obj->size, flags);
+ return dma_buf_export(gem_obj, &i915_dmabuf_ops, gem_obj->size, flags,
+ NULL);
}
static int i915_gem_object_get_pages_dmabuf(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists