[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140520072057.GA4952@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 00:20:57 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
riel@...hat.com, kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
fengguang.wu@...el.com, kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xfs@....sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/vmscan: Do not block forever at
shrink_inactive_list().
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:59:15PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> So current_is_kswapd() returns true for a thread which is not kswapd.
> That's a bit smelly.
>
> Should this thread really be incrementing KSWAPD_INODESTEAL instead of
> PGINODESTEAL, for example? current_is_kswapd() does a range of things,
> only one(?) of which you actually want.
Actually we want all of them. The allocation workqueue is a workaround
for the incredible stack usage in the Linux I/O path. If it is called
by kswapd it should act as if it were kswapd for all purposes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists