[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <537B0C6E.4030501@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 13:33:58 +0530
From: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org,
kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
riel@...hat.com, mgorman@...e.de, ak@...ux.intel.com,
peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org, dave.hansen@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 2/2] powerpc/pseries: init fault_around_order for pseries
On Tuesday 20 May 2014 12:58 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 8 May 2014 14:58:16 +0530 Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/pseries.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/pseries.h
>> @@ -17,6 +17,8 @@ struct device_node;
>> extern void request_event_sources_irqs(struct device_node *np,
>> irq_handler_t handler, const char *name);
>>
>> +extern unsigned int fault_around_order;
>
> This isn't an appropriate header file for exporting something from core
> mm - what happens if arch/mn10300 wants it?.
>
> I guess include/linux/mm.h is the place.
>
Rusty already suggested this. My bad. Reason for adding it here was
that, I did the performance test for this platform. Will change and send
it out.
Thanks for review
Regards
Maddy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists