| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 13:53:23 +0530 From: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> To: Pedro Alves <palves@...hat.com> CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, suresh.b.siddha@...el.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ptrace: Clarify PTRACE_GETREGSET/PTRACE_SETREGSET, documentation in uapi header On 05/14/2014 04:24 PM, Pedro Alves wrote: > On 05/14/14 08:10, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >> On 05/13/2014 11:39 PM, Pedro Alves wrote: >>> On 05/05/14 05:10, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >>>> On 05/01/2014 07:43 PM, Pedro Alves wrote: >>> OK, then this is what I suggest instead: > ... >>>> Shall I resend the patch with the your proposed changes and your "Signed-off-by" and >>>> moving myself as "Reported-by" ? >>> >>> No idea of the actual policy to follow. Feel free to do that if that's the >>> standard procedure. >> >> Even I am not sure about this, so to preserve the correct authorship, would you >> mind sending this patch ? > > Here you go. This is against current Linus'. Please take it from > here if necessary. Thanks Pedro for the patch. I would assume that the ptrace maintainer (Roland or Oleg as mentioned in the MAINTAINERS file) will pick it from here and merge mainline. Please do let me know if the process is otherwise different. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists