[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <537B1523.1010503@st.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 10:41:07 +0200
From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@...com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel@...inux.com>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...com>
Subject: Re: [STLinux Kernel] [PATCH 3/4] ARM: DT: STi: Add DT node for MiPHY365x
On 05/20/2014 10:28 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
>>>>> The MiPHY365x is a Generic PHY which can serve various SATA or PCIe
>>>>> devices. It has 2 ports which it can use for either; both SATA, both
>>>>> PCIe or one of each in any configuration.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cc: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...com>
>>>>> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
>>>>> Acked-by: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/stih416-b2020-revE.dts | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/stih416-b2020.dts | 6 ++++++
>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/stih416.dtsi | 14 ++++++++++++++
>>>>> 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+)
>>>>> create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/stih416-b2020-revE.dts
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih416-b2020-revE.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih416-b2020-revE.dts
>>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>>> index 0000000..23fdaf7
>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih416-b2020-revE.dts
>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
>>>>> +/*
>>>>> + * Copyright (C) 2014 STMicroelectronics Limited.
>>>>> + * Author: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>>>>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
>>>>> + * publishhed by the Free Software Foundation.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> +/dts-v1/;
>>>>> +#include "stih416.dtsi"
>>>>> +#include "stih41x-b2020.dtsi"
>>>>> +/ {
>>>>> + model = "STiH416 B2020 REV-E";
>>>>> + compatible = "st,stih416-b2020", "st,stih416";
>>>>> +
>>>>> + soc {
>>>>> + miphy365x_phy: miphy365x@...82000 {
>>>>> + st,pcie-tx-pol-inv;
>>>>> + st,sata-gen = <3>;
>>>>> + };
>>>>> + };
>>>>> +};
>>>> Shouldn't this new board being added in a separate patch?
>>>
>>> I certainly can do that, but I don't think that it's necessary?
>>
>> I think it is, as you introduce a new board.
>
> Introducing an empty dts file just so you can say "this is a new
> board" seems odd to me, but I'll go with whatever you feel it right.
>
>> Moreover, the miphy description being the same as in
>> stih416-b2020.dts, so I don't understand why you introduce this
>> board for this feature.
>
> It's historical. There are other differences between rev-E and the
> other reversions, such as; gpio-leds (red, green) and the reset GPIO
> for ethernet. As these are dts files (rather than dtsi) files, you
> can only use one at a time.
My point was to create a new patch that would also introduce the
differences (Ethernet, leds...). The commit message would explain the
differences versus stih416-b2020.
From your patch, if I didn't know the differences, I would ask why you
don't use stih416-b2020.dts.
If you have another pending patch that make Ethernet to work on revE
board, you can keep this one as it is.
>
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih416-b2020.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih416-b2020.dts
>>>>> index 276f28d..172f222 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih416-b2020.dts
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih416-b2020.dts
>>>>> @@ -13,4 +13,10 @@
>>>>> model = "STiH416 B2020";
>>>>> compatible = "st,stih416", "st,stih416-b2020";
>>>>>
>>>>> + soc {
>>>>> + miphy365x_phy: miphy365x@...82000 {
>>>>> + st,pcie-tx-pol-inv;
>>>>> + st,sata-gen = <3>;
>>>>> + };
>>>>> + };
>>>>> };
>>>> ...
>>>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists