[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <537B1766.1090808@bfs.de>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 10:50:46 +0200
From: walter harms <wharms@....de>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
CC: Masaru Nomura <massa.nomura@...il.com>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
andreas.dilger@...el.com, oleg.drokin@...el.com,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] staging: lustre: lnet: socklnd: Clean up memset(...)
Am 18.05.2014 19:27, schrieb Joe Perches:
> On Sun, 2014-05-18 at 18:19 +0100, Masaru Nomura wrote:
>> Remove prohibited space and fix line over 80 characters of
>> memset(...) to meet kernel coding style.
> []
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/socklnd/socklnd.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/socklnd/socklnd.c
> []
>> @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ ksocknal_create_peer(ksock_peer_t **peerp, lnet_ni_t *ni, lnet_process_id_t id)
>> if (peer == NULL)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> - memset (peer, 0, sizeof (*peer)); /* NULL pointers/clear flags etc */
>> + memset(peer, 0, sizeof(*peer)); /* NULL pointers/clear flags etc */
>
> It looks like this memset is unnecessary
> as it's already zeroed by LIBCFS_ALLOC->
> LIBCFS_ALLOC_GFP->LIBCFS_ALLOC_POST->memset.
>
> It seems as if all these ALLOC macros could
> use quite a bit of cleaning/sorting out.
>
for a start,
some kind soul could replace the malloc()/memset() with zalloc().
re,
wh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists