linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 4/7] ata: ahci_platform: add the Marvell Berlin AHCI compatible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140520092307.GA26491@kwain>
Date:	Tue, 20 May 2014 11:23:07 +0200
From:	Antoine Ténart 
	<antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
Cc:	Antoine Ténart 
	<antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com>, tj@...nel.org, kishon@...com,
	alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com,
	thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com, zmxu@...vell.com,
	jszhang@...vell.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/7] ata: ahci_platform: add the Marvell Berlin AHCI
 compatible

On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 11:18:11AM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> On 05/20/2014 11:04 AM, Antoine Ténart wrote:
> >The Marvell Berlin AHCI has all his specific in the PHY driver. It then
> >only need to use the libahci functions to work properly.
> 
> If it is that generic, ..
> 
> >Add its compatible into the libahci_platform driver.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Antoine Ténart <antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com>
> >---
> >  drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c b/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c
> >index ef67e79944f9..bc050aabf206 100644
> >--- a/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c
> >+++ b/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c
> >@@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id ahci_of_match[] = {
> >  	{ .compatible = "snps,exynos5440-ahci", },
> >  	{ .compatible = "ibm,476gtr-ahci", },
> >  	{ .compatible = "snps,dwc-ahci", },
> >+	{ .compatible = "marvell,berlin-ahci", },
> 
> .. why have a Marvell-specific compatible?

Well, the 3 other compatibles seemed as generic as the marvell one. Just
following what was done before here.

> How about "generic-ahci" instead, like we have for other fooHCIs
> already?

That would avoid an endless list of compatibles :)

Antoine

-- 
Antoine Ténart, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/