[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140520114315.GA4438@lianli>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 13:43:15 +0200
From: Emil Goode <emilgoode@...il.com>
To: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...escale.com>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: imx: convert camera init to use
platform_device_register_full()
Hello Uwe,
Thank you for the review and sorry for the late response.
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 08:27:22AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello Emil,
>
> thanks for your effort.
>
> On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 10:51:00PM +0200, Emil Goode wrote:
> > This converts the imx camera allocation and initialization functions
> > to use platform_device_register_full() thus simplifying the code.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Emil Goode <emilgoode@...il.com>
> > ---
> > Only build tested, unfortunately I currently don't have the hardware.
> >
> > arch/arm/mach-imx/devices/platform-ipu-core.c | 43 +++++++++----------------
> > arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-mx31_3ds.c | 5 ++-
> > arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-mx31moboard.c | 6 ++--
> > arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-mx35_3ds.c | 5 ++-
> > arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-pcm037.c | 5 ++-
> > 5 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/devices/platform-ipu-core.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/devices/platform-ipu-core.c
> > index 6bd7c3f..13ea542 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/devices/platform-ipu-core.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/devices/platform-ipu-core.c
> > @@ -69,42 +69,29 @@ struct platform_device *__init imx_alloc_mx3_camera(
> IMHO you should better rename the function because now it doesn't only
> allocate the device, but also registers it.
Agreed.
>
> Also I doubt that it's OK to call dma_declare_coherent_memory after the
> device is added. In this case maybe extend
> platform_device_register_full? And also add a warning to
> dma_declare_coherent_memory if it is called for an already added device?
> (Added a few people to Cc: that might be able to comment this. I don't
> even know if there is a reliable way to check if a device is already
> added.)
Yes I also had doubts about that. However, apart from this patch there are
three other places in arch/arm/mach-imx/ where dma_declare_coherent_memory()
is called after calling platform_device_register_full().
Perhaps this is enough reason to extend platform_device_register_full().
It would be great to get some more feedback on this and also if there is a
reliable way to check if a device is already added.
Best regards,
Emil Goode
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists