[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohpomKvPcioNmfzvx7vqJHqs_TrhnHH6yYb5w_0f+YvA5hvA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 17:35:04 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
Cc: Chander Kashyap <chander.kashyap@...aro.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Chander Kashyap <k.chander@...sung.com>,
Inderpal Singh <inderpal.s@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] PM / OPP: discard duplicate OPPs
On 20 May 2014 16:56, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
> But we aren't talking about failure here. Its not failure. The operation
> we are trying to do is already done and nothing should break if the
> OPP was already there or its added now. Its all the same.
Though after more thought into this I feel this must also be done:
diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp.c b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
index bdf09f5..3f540d8 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/opp.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
@@ -453,9 +453,13 @@ int dev_pm_opp_add(struct device *dev, unsigned
long freq, unsigned long u_volt)
}
if (new_opp->rate == opp->rate) {
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ if (new_opp->u_volt == opp->u_volt)
+ ret = -EEXIST;
mutex_unlock(&dev_opp_list_lock);
kfree(new_opp);
- return 0;
+ return ret;
}
list_add_rcu(&new_opp->node, head);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists