linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 14/20] arch,mn10300: Fold atomic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <26031.1400591132@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date:	Tue, 20 May 2014 14:05:32 +0100
From:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	dhowells@...hat.com, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...nel.org, will.deacon@....com,
	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	Koichi Yasutake <yasutake.koichi@...panasonic.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/20] arch,mn10300: Fold atomic_ops

Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:

> +#define ATOMIC_OPS(op) ATOMIC_OP(op) ATOMIC_OP_RETURN(op)

Can ATOMIC_OP() just be an alias for ATOMIC_OP_RETURN() where that is
appropriate?  I suspect several arches (MN10300 included) are going to return
the value *anyway*.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/