[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohpok5QZvQzSkDxeLTnRK9F0Zf0kr2PD+gbP+FqmhL_dYLCQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 20:19:29 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arvind Chauhan <arvind.chauhan@....com>,
Ips Gandhi <inderpal.s@...sung.com>,
Chander Kashyap <chander.kashyap@...aro.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>,
Chander Kashyap <k.chander@...sung.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...rao.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] PM/OPP: discard duplicate OPPs
On 20 May 2014 19:57, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com> wrote:
>> + pr_warn("%s: duplicate OPPs detected. Existing: freq: %lu, volt: %lu, enabled: %d. New: freq: %lu, volt: %lu, enabled: %d\n",
> dev_warn please? we already know the dev pointer. Also can we reduce
> this down to 80 character limit if possible?
breaking printk string into multiple line isn't suggested as it affects
readability and so I kept it this way. Another was was to break printk
itself intro two-three printk lines, but that would have looked bad
on console.
So, will retain it :(
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists