[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140520173308.GE16428@pd.tnic>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 19:33:08 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Chen Yucong <slaoub@...il.com>
Cc: tony.luck@...el.com, ak@...ux.intel.com, ying.huang@...el.com,
seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-edac@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/mce: Distirbute the clear operation of mces_seen
to Per-CPU rather than only monarch CPU
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:11:25AM +0800, Chen Yucong wrote:
> mces_seen is a Per-CPU variable which should only be accessed by
> Per-CPU as possible. So the clear operation of mces_seen should also
> be lcoal to Per-CPU rather than monarch CPU.
>
> Meanwhile, there is also a potential risk that mces_seen will not
> be be cleared if a timeout occors in mce_end for monarch CPU. As a
> reuslt, the stale value of mces_seen will reappear on the next mce.
I don't know how many times I have to tell you this already: if we reach
the timeout, we have a much bigger friggin' problem!
What you could do instead is make the machine panic in the tolerant==1,
i.e., the default case, in mce_timed_out().
Basically, in the case any core is stuck and we reach a timeout, we want
to panic the whole box immediately. There's a very little chance we can
recover so panic is the only sane thing left to do.
Ok?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists