| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <537B93A6.9030205@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 23:10:54 +0530
From: Keerthy <a0393675@...com>
To: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
CC: Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<robh+dt@...nel.org>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
<sameo@...ux.intel.com>, <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
<ian@...mlogic.co.uk>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <broonie@...aro.org>,
<swarren@...dia.com>, <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] mfd: tps65917: Add driver for the TPS65917 PMIC
Hi Nishanth,
On Tuesday 20 May 2014 07:45 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 05/20/2014 04:11 AM, Keerthy wrote:
> [...]
>> +config MFD_TPS65917
>> + bool "TI TPS65917 series chips"
>> + select MFD_CORE
>> + select REGMAP_I2C
>> + select REGMAP_IRQ
>> + depends on I2C=y
> ^^ why =y?
Palmas derived. I will knock off the 'y'
>> + help
>> + If you say yes here you get support for the TPS65917
>> + PMIC chips from Texas Instruments. The device provides
>> + 5 confgurable SPMSs and 5 LDOs, thermal protection module,
>> + GPADC.
>> +
>> config MFD_TPS80031
>> bool "TI TPS80031/TPS80032 Power Management chips"
>> depends on I2C=y
>> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/Makefile b/drivers/mfd/Makefile
>> index 2851275..248a60b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mfd/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/Makefile
>> @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ tps65912-objs := tps65912-core.o tps65912-irq.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_TPS65912) += tps65912.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_TPS65912_I2C) += tps65912-i2c.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_TPS65912_SPI) += tps65912-spi.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_TPS65917) += tps65917.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_TPS80031) += tps80031.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_MENELAUS) += menelaus.o
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/tps65917.c b/drivers/mfd/tps65917.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..dbd67c5
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/tps65917.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,573 @@
>> +/*
>> + * TI TPS65917 Integrated power management chipsets
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (C) 2014 Texas Instruments Incorporated - http://www.ti.com/
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
>> + * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
>> + *
>> + * This program is distributed "as is" WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY of any
>> + * kind, whether expressed or implied; without even the implied warranty
>> + * of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
>> + * GNU General Public License version 2 for more details.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/moduleparam.h>
>> +#include <linux/init.h>
>> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>> +#include <linux/i2c.h>
>> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
>> +#include <linux/irq.h>
>> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
>> +#include <linux/err.h>
>> +#include <linux/mfd/core.h>
>> +#include <linux/mfd/tps65917.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> <snip>
>> +
>> +static int tps65917_voltaile_regs[] = {
>> + TPS65917_SMPS1_CTRL,
>> + TPS65917_SMPS2_CTRL,
>> + TPS65917_SMPS3_CTRL,
>> + TPS65917_SMPS4_CTRL,
>> + TPS65917_SMPS5_CTRL,
>> + TPS65917_LDO1_CTRL,
>> + TPS65917_LDO2_CTRL,
>> + TPS65917_LDO3_CTRL,
>> + TPS65917_LDO4_CTRL,
>> + TPS65917_LDO5_CTRL,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static bool is_volatile_reg(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
>> +{
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Caching all the required regulator registers.
>> + */
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < 11; i++)
>> + if (reg == tps65917_voltaile_regs[i])
>> + return true;
>> +
>> + return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct regmap_config tps65917_regmap_config[TPS65917_NUM_CLIENTS] = {
>> + {
>> + .reg_bits = 8,
>> + .val_bits = 8,
>> + .volatile_reg = is_volatile_reg,
>> + .cache_type = REGCACHE_NONE,
> Assume you wanted cached here, since you are marking certain registers
> as volatile?
> [...]
Yes. I will correct this.
>> +};
>> +
>> +int tps65917_ext_control_req_config(struct tps65917 *tps65917,
>> + enum tps65917_external_requestor_id id,
>> + int ext_ctrl, bool enable)
>> +{
> kernel doc style documentation
> [...]
>
>> +static struct tps65917 *tps65917_dev;
>> +
>> +static const struct of_device_id of_tps65917_match_tbl[] = {
>> + {
>> + .compatible = "ti,tps65917",
>> + },
>> + { },
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, of_tps65917_match_tbl);
>> +
>> +static int tps65917_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
>> + const struct i2c_device_id *id)
>> +{
> [...]
>> + /*
>> + * If we are probing with DT do this the DT way and return here
>> + * otherwise continue and add devices using mfd helpers.
>> + */
>> + if (node) {
>> + ret = of_platform_populate(node, NULL, NULL, &i2c->dev);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + goto err_irq;
>> + else if (pdata->pm_off && !pm_power_off)
>> + tps65917_dev = tps65917;
> and where is the actual power off function?
I will add that.
>
>> + }
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> +err_irq:
>> + regmap_del_irq_chip(tps65917->irq, tps65917->irq_data);
>> +err_i2c:
>> + for (i = 1; i < TPS65917_NUM_CLIENTS; i++) {
>> + if (tps65917->i2c_clients[i])
>> + i2c_unregister_device(tps65917->i2c_clients[i]);
>> + }
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int tps65917_i2c_remove(struct i2c_client *i2c)
>> +{
>> + struct tps65917 *tps65917 = i2c_get_clientdata(i2c);
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + regmap_del_irq_chip(tps65917->irq, tps65917->irq_data);
>> +
>> + for (i = 1; i < TPS65917_NUM_CLIENTS; i++) {
>> + if (tps65917->i2c_clients[i])
>> + i2c_unregister_device(tps65917->i2c_clients[i]);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct i2c_device_id tps65917_i2c_id[] = {
>> + { "tps65917", },
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, tps65917_i2c_id);
>> +
>> +static struct i2c_driver tps65917_i2c_driver = {
>> + .driver = {
>> + .name = "tps65917",
>> + .of_match_table = of_tps65917_match_tbl,
>> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>> + },
>> + .probe = tps65917_i2c_probe,
>> + .remove = tps65917_i2c_remove,
>> + .id_table = tps65917_i2c_id,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int __init tps65917_i2c_init(void)
>> +{
>> + return i2c_add_driver(&tps65917_i2c_driver);
>> +}
>> +/* init early so consumer devices can complete system boot */
>> +subsys_initcall(tps65917_i2c_init);
> Should we let them just defer?
>
> [...]
Guess most drivers in the mfd folder use subsys_initcall
>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/tps65917.h b/include/linux/mfd/tps65917.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..8232e22
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/include/linux/mfd/tps65917.h
>> +
>> +struct tps65917 {
>> + struct device *dev;
>> +
>> + struct i2c_client *i2c_clients[TPS65917_NUM_CLIENTS];
>> + struct regmap *regmap[TPS65917_NUM_CLIENTS];
>> +
>> + /* Stored chip id */
>> + int id;
>> +
>> + struct tps65917_pmic *pmic;
>> +
>> + /* IRQ Data */
>> + int irq;
>> + u32 irq_mask;
>> + /* mutext for irq */
>> + struct mutex irq_lock;
>> + struct regmap_irq_chip_data *irq_data;
>> +};
> For all structures, could you use kerneldoc style documentation?
> See: Documentation/kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt +273
>
>
>> +static inline int tps65917_read(struct tps65917 *tps65917, unsigned int base,
>> + unsigned int reg, unsigned int *val)
> Again for all functions expected to be called by other driver(such as
> regulator) to mfd, kernel-doc style documentation?
>
> [...]
>
Ok.
Thanks,
Keerthy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists