linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] mfd: bcm590xx: add support for secondary I2C slave address

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 20 May 2014 23:17:58 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Matt Porter <mporter@...aro.org>
Cc:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Devicetree List <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Tim Kryger <tim.kryger@...aro.org>,
	Markus Mayer <markus.mayer@...aro.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux ARM Kernel List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] mfd: bcm590xx: add support for secondary I2C
 slave address

On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 05:57:26PM -0400, Matt Porter wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:44:39PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > I looked at that but it seems I already acked the regulator part of the
> > series and nothing else looked immediately relevant?

> The series has cross dependencies (shared header include) and thus needs
> to have both the mfd and regulator portions merged together. You had
> mentioned in the v1 version that you'd like to take it through the
> regulator tree and so Lee's comments earlier were with regard to you
> taking the mfd portions.

Right, OK - because it depends on the earlier MFD patches (I think?) I
was expecting it to be applied in MFD and merged over to regulator.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)