[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140521060548.GM21128@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 11:35:49 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To: "Shevchenko, Andriy" <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
Cc: "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"dmaengine@...r.kernel.org" <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dmaengine: sa11x0: remove broken #ifdef
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 09:38:37PM +0530, Shevchenko, Andriy wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-05-08 at 16:56 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > The sa11x0_dma_pm_ops unconditionally reference sa11x0_dma_resume
> > and sa11x0_dma_suspend, which currently breaks if CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> > is disabled.
> >
> > There is probably a better way to remove the reference in this
> > case, but the safe choice is to have the suspend/resume code always
> > built in the driver.
>
> Maybe you could create a macro in pm.h for *_noirq version of
> suspend/resume? However, like we discussed with Vinod it's much better
> to use suspend_late/resume_early for DMAC device drivers, though I have
> no idea if it works for sa11x0.
It should work as the guidance is not client/controller specfic. But I think
thats not the point here as the fix is not related to how suspend is
implemented..
--
~Vinod
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> > Cc: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
> > Cc: dmaengine@...r.kernel.org
> > Cc: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
> > Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/dma/sa11x0-dma.c | 4 ----
> > 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/dma/sa11x0-dma.c b/drivers/dma/sa11x0-dma.c
> > index ab26d46..5ebdfbc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/dma/sa11x0-dma.c
> > +++ b/drivers/dma/sa11x0-dma.c
> > @@ -113,11 +113,9 @@ struct sa11x0_dma_phy {
> > struct sa11x0_dma_desc *txd_load;
> > unsigned sg_done;
> > struct sa11x0_dma_desc *txd_done;
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> > u32 dbs[2];
> > u32 dbt[2];
> > u32 dcsr;
> > -#endif
> > };
> >
> > struct sa11x0_dma_dev {
> > @@ -984,7 +982,6 @@ static int sa11x0_dma_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> > static int sa11x0_dma_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > {
> > struct sa11x0_dma_dev *d = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > @@ -1054,7 +1051,6 @@ static int sa11x0_dma_resume(struct device *dev)
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> > -#endif
> >
> > static const struct dev_pm_ops sa11x0_dma_pm_ops = {
> > .suspend_noirq = sa11x0_dma_suspend,
>
>
> --
> Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
> Intel Finland Oy
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists