[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140521063826.GC30445@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 08:38:26 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Russ Anderson <rja@....com>,
Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com>,
Hedi Berriche <hedi@....com>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Reduce the rate of needless idle load balancing
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 02:39:27PM -0700, Tim Chen wrote:
> From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v2] sched: Reduce the rate of needless idle load balancing
>
>
> The current no_hz idle load balancer do load balancing for *all* idle cpus,
> even though the time due to load balance for a particular
> idle cpu could be still a while in the future. This introduces a much
> higher load balancing rate than what is necessary. The patch
> changes the behavior by only doing idle load balancing on
> behalf of an idle cpu only when it is due for load balancing.
>
> On SGI's systems with over 3000 cores, the cpu responsible for idle balancing
> got overwhelmed with idle balancing, and introduces a lot of OS noise
> to workloads. This patch fixes the issue.
>
> Acked-by: Russ Anderson <rja@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>
> Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
Thanks!
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists