[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140521081727.GE2708@katana>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 10:17:27 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: Mike Looijmans <mike.looijmans@...ic.nl>
Cc: linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c-davinci: Handle signals gracefully
> > dev_err(dev->dev, "controller timed out\n");
> > davinci_i2c_recover_bus(dev);
> > i2c_davinci_init(dev);
> > @@ -384,7 +384,6 @@ i2c_davinci_xfer_msg(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg *msg, int stop)
> > if (dev->buf_len) {
> > /* This should be 0 if all bytes were transferred
> > * or dev->cmd_err denotes an error.
> > - * A signal may have aborted the transfer.
> > */
> > if (r >= 0) {
> > dev_err(dev->dev, "abnormal termination buf_len=%i\n",
> > @@ -436,22 +435,24 @@ i2c_davinci_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg msgs[], int num)
> > ret = i2c_davinci_wait_bus_not_busy(dev, 1);
> > if (ret < 0) {
> > dev_warn(dev->dev, "timeout waiting for bus ready\n");
> > - return ret;
> > + goto error;
>
> You are fixing the error path here to include the completion? This is a
> seperate patch IMO.
Is my remark true? I still prefer the seperate patch, but we may also
simply update the commit message.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists