[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <537C040E.3040901@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 10:40:30 +0900
From: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>
To: Chen Yucong <slaoub@...il.com>, tony.luck@...el.com
CC: bp@...en8.de, ak@...ux.intel.com, ying.huang@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/mce: Distirbute the clear operation of mces_seen
to Per-CPU rather than only monarch CPU
(2014/05/20 11:11), Chen Yucong wrote:
> mces_seen is a Per-CPU variable which should only be accessed by Per-CPU as possible. So the
> clear operation of mces_seen should also be lcoal to Per-CPU rather than monarch CPU.
I don't think it should be local.
Originally what we want to have here is memory to save mces_seen for each online cpus,
such as a global array like mces_seen[cpus]. But at same time we don't want to preallocate
big array enough for max possible cpus. So we use per-cpu store instead.
>
> Meanwhile, there is also a potential risk that mces_seen will not be be cleared if a timeout
> occors in mce_end for monarch CPU. As a reuslt, the stale value of mces_seen will reappear
> on the next mce.
In case if we decide panic in mce path, uncleared mces_seen can be referred from memory dump.
I suppose it will help trouble investigation.
>
> Based on the above reasons, this patch distirbute the clear operation of mces_seen to Per-CPU
> rather than only monarch CPU.
"local" "occurs" "result" "distribute"
I recommend you to use spell-checker for your postings...
Thanks,
H.Seto
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists