[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <537CA54A.8030408@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 09:08:26 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: sched: spinlock recursion in migrate_swap_stop
On 05/20/2014 09:03 AM, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On 05/20/2014 07:04 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:05:31PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
>>> >> ping? It seems to be easy enough to reproduce on -next, I'd be happy to try
>>> >> debug patches/fixes.
>> >
>> > Does this fuzzing you do also include hotplug? If so, does disabling
>> > that make this problem go away?
>> >
> There were no hotplug operations going on when this happens, so it seems
> unrelated.
I've added a small test:
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 927fa33..b5e11c7 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -1154,6 +1156,7 @@ int migrate_swap(struct task_struct *cur, struct task_struct *p)
goto out;
trace_sched_swap_numa(cur, arg.src_cpu, p, arg.dst_cpu);
+ BUG_ON(cur == p);
ret = stop_two_cpus(arg.dst_cpu, arg.src_cpu, migrate_swap_stop, &arg);
out:
Which seems to get hit. This sounds like a race with task moving to
other cpu maybe?
Thanks,
Sasha
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists