[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5291281.0OW8pVdbhQ@wuerfel>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 18:04:43 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
andriy.shevchenko@...el.com, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, zhuzhenhua@...winnertech.com,
shuge@...winnertech.com, linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com,
kevin.z.m.zh@...il.com, sunny@...winnertech.com,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/2] Add support for the Allwinner A31 DMA Controller
On Wednesday 21 May 2014 17:55:51 Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 05:23:41PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 21 May 2014 17:15:54 Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > Changes from v7:
> > > - select DMA_OF, since we're only relying on DT
> > >
> >
> > I missed the discussion about this issue, but it seems wrong to me.
> > DMA_OF is currently enabled if we have both DMAENGINE and OF turned on.
> >
> > If OF is disabled but DMA_OF gets selected by DMA_SUN6I, what happens?
>
> Is that even possible with a multiplatform-based platform?
It's not possible for ARCH_SUNXI or any other that depends on
ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM. I just noticed that you have 'depends on ARCH_SUNXI',
so the 'select DMA_OF' statement is just redundant, not wrong.
However, if the driver was 'depends on ARCH_SUNXI || COMPILE_TEST' as many
others are nowadays, it would be a bug.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists