linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/7] acpi, apei, ghes: Introduce more generic mechanism to init/deinit GHES error notifications.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140521181145.GO21205@pd.tnic>
Date:	Wed, 21 May 2014 20:11:45 +0200
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@...aro.org>
Cc:	rjw@...ysocki.net, lenb@...nel.org, tony.luck@...el.com,
	bp@...e.de, m.chehab@...sung.com, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
	x86@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] acpi, apei, ghes: Introduce more generic mechanism
 to init/deinit GHES error notifications.

On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 04:31:20PM +0200, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
> Well, we need to keep these strings somewhere :) IMO, this is simpler
> solution. What would be advantage of additional map function?

Nevermind, I got confused here.

> I am validating generic->notify.type at the begin of function and
> return error in case of unknown value. I think there is no need to
> check that again.

Yes, you do :)

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/